There is no way to get around the fact that any map is partly judged by how it fits into the long history of mapmaking.   People really like maps because of this history and to pretend that it is not a big factor is to miss an essential point.  Even though my maps are made today and are enhanced by modern technology, and other systems exist which mean that you would not navigate by my work, there is still an allure to seeing how a

  As previously discussed, as each map is more fully drawn, it takes on a life of its own.  The backgrounds give way to more detail.  The details require more research and careful consideration and this often leads to further areas of study not originally planned for.  This is not only OK but positively exciting.  The maps aren’t produced on a schedule and each one has to take as long as needed to reach a satisfying place.  Sometimes these investigations are really fruitful and supply especially

Once I’ve been able to settle on correct and accurate data, which often includes personally walking the sites to verify certain details, it’s time to actually begin drawing the backgrounds of the main elements.  This very tactile experience really begins to put me in contact with the area I’m working on in a way that is personal and somewhat transforming.  As I draw each individual line and point, bump and node, a connection to the forms develops which is both special and difficult to describe.  

In my last posting, the basic form of the new maps was decided and I had gathered a fair amount of basic information that could be available.  The next big step is rectifying and justifying all the competing and contradictory data.  The big secret of maps is, despite all the great information they contain and the comprehensive manner in which that information is presented, there are often many inaccuracies in every one of them.  Usually, their main focus is quite correct.  That is, nautical maps

Getting Started, Where to Begin--Having stated in the “Cartographic Thoughts and Ideas” section about taking you along with me on the journey of making a map, this is step one of the “getting going” phase.  Decide what area to work on and begin with basic research of what already exists.  This used to be much more onerous but not since the Internet has been invented.  Although my process really stresses the hand-crafted quality of the final product, it does not mean that I am anti-technology. 

I was recently down at the Jersey Shore recharging my batteries for the ongoing new maps that are in the works.  While there, I was able to visit some good friends and longtime supporters of my mapmaking endeavors.  They have encouraged me from the beginning over the past 12 years and have carried them in their shops and galleries.  Before the websites, this was the main way in which I was able to have my work shown and I am grateful for all of their

As this new, communicating process is pretty much in its earliest stages, I thought it might be fun and informative to chronicle the process and see how the final results might be impacted by doing so.  For the next couple of months (at least), this post will posit my experiences in creating this year’s maps.  Look for these installment soon under the blog category “The Mapmaking Process”.  In the meantime, under this heading, I want to try and solicit more feedback from those of you

Following the initial launch of my website, www.coastalartmaps.com, and its related Facebook and Etsy sites, I got a lot of positive feedback from friends and other interested parties about the style and content.  Many folks asked very good questions about why I have done the maps that you’ve seen so far and why I don’t have others.  Most specifically, numerous people asked about Florida, a state that has a very large coastline and which many people from the greater NY area have ties to.  These